唐纳德·特朗普在社交媒体上证实,他不会签署《21世纪住房之路法案》,其中包括在 2030 年底之前禁止美国 CBDC,这为该法案于周六成为法律奠定了基础。 随着唐纳德·特朗普总统签署的最后期限临近,一项包含美国央行数字货币(CBDC)禁令的两党住房法案将成为法律。 周五午夜刚过,《21世纪住房之路法案》将在特朗普手中停留10天(不包括周日),这是一项法案在没有否决或签名的情况下可以放在总统办公桌上的最长时间。根据美国宪法,无需特朗普采取行动,该法案将自动成为法律,特朗普取消了 6 月 24 日的该法案签署仪式。
特朗普在周五的社交媒体帖子中证实,他不会签署住房法案,称国会中对该法案投票的共和党人“愚蠢”,并敦促参议院优先考虑一项有争议的投票法案,即《拯救美国法案》。这项立法要求人们亲自提供美国公民身份证明才能进行登记,该立法因声称它将剥夺已经有资格投票的公民的权利而受到广泛批评。 资料来源:唐纳德·特朗普 众议院和参议院于 6 月在民主党和共和党的支持下通过了住房法案,其中包括禁止美联储在 2030 年 12 月 31 日之前发行或创建 CBDC“或任何实质上类似的数字资产”的措辞。许多分析师将数字美元禁令视为获得共和党支持的政治赠品。特朗普在周五的帖子中没有提及 CBDC 禁令。 相关:特朗普支持 CFTC 对预测市场的权威 “他拒绝签署 30 年来最大的住房法案,”该法案的共同发起人、参议员伊丽莎白·沃伦 (Elizabeth Warren) 在谈到特朗普的行为时表示。 “好消息:无论如何它都会成为法律。”
特朗普的不作为也会影响加密货币市场结构吗? 尽管美国总统五月份表示,他打算制定“面向未来”的数字资产监管规定,但他拒绝签署与“拯救美国法案”无关的立法,引发了人们的疑问:参议院正在审议的数字资产市场清晰度(CLARITY)法案是否可能面临与住房法案类似的情况。 许多人认为《清晰法案》是影响数字资产监管的最重要立法之一,该法案已经在众议院和两个重要的参议院委员会获得通过。国会共和党领导人预计,一旦立法者周一结束工作时间返回,该法案将在 7 月份进入众议院进行全院投票。 特朗普与加密货币行业的关系已经使民主党和共和党之间关于市场结构法案的讨论变得复杂。总统透露,到 2025 年,他的加密货币企业收入将超过 14 亿美元,其中包括模因币和家族的 World Liberty Financial 平台。 杂志:加密货币的清晰法案在参议院面临道德方面的党派之争
Donald Trump confirmed on social media that he would not sign the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, which includes a ban on a US CBDC until the end of 2030, setting the stage for the bill to become law on Saturday.
A bipartisan housing bill containing a ban on a central bank digital currency (CBDC) in the United States is set to become law as the deadline approaches for President Donald Trump to sign it.
Just after midnight on Friday, the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act will have been in Trump’s hands for 10 days, excluding Sundays, the maximum amount of time a bill can be on the president’s desk without a veto or a signature. Under the US Constitution, the legislation will automatically become law without action from Trump, who canceled the signing ceremony for the bill on Jun 24.
In a Friday social media post, Trump confirmed that he would not sign the housing bill, calling Republicans in Congress who voted on the legislation “dumb” and urging the Senate to instead prioritize a controversial voting bill, the SAVE America Act. The legislation, which would require people to provide proof of US citizenship in person to register, has received widespread criticism for claims that it would disenfranchise citizens already eligible to vote.
Source: Donald Trump
The housing bill, passed by the House of Representatives and Senate in June with support from Democrats and Republicans, included language barring the Federal Reserve from issuing or creating a CBDC “or any digital asset that is substantially similar” until Dec. 31, 2030. Many analysts saw the digital dollar ban as a political giveaway to gain Republican support. Trump did not address the CBDC ban in his Friday post.
Related: Trump backs CFTC authority over prediction markets
“[H]e’s refusing to sign the biggest housing bill in 30 years,” said Senator Elizabeth Warren, who co-sponsored the bill, on Trump’s actions. “The good news: it’s going to become law anyway.”
Could Trump’s inaction also affect crypto market structure?
Although the US president said in May that he intended to “future-proof” digital asset regulations, his refusal to sign legislation unrelated to the SAVE America Act has raised questions about whether the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act under consideration in the Senate could face a similar situation as the housing bill.
The CLARITY Act, considered by many to be one of the most significant pieces of legislation affecting digital asset regulation, has already passed the House and two crucial Senate committees. Republican leaders in Congress expect that the bill will be heading to the full chamber for a floor vote in July once lawmakers return from state work periods on Monday.
Trump’s ties to the crypto industry have already complicated discussions between Democrats and Republicans over the market structure bill. The president disclosed earning more than $1.4 billion in income from his crypto ventures in 2025, including memecoins and the family’s World Liberty Financial platform.
Magazine: Crypto’s CLARITY Act faces partisan fight over ethics on Senate floor